The Omega design partner program is open.Apply to build with us →
Autonomous development

Hand over the spec. Get back a working product.

Your developers describe the product or feature. Omega's agents plan it, write the code and the tests, and keep going until the build passes, with no human in the loop. It's built to be reliable on long jobs and to cost less than running frontier models.

Acme CorpProjects / Vendor portalDedicated cluster · eu-central
Vendor portal / BuildRunning · 38 min
Spec v2

Vendor onboarding portal with SSO, document upload and a two-step approval flow. 11 requirements.

✓ Plan3 services27 tasks · Postgres
● Build41 files186 tests written
○ Red-teamScheduledafter release candidate
  • ✓186/186 tests passed · regression suite green
  • ✓Upload checks added in services/documents
  • ✓Architecture planned from spec v2
Example projectHuman approvals required: 0
The problem

AI coding still needs too much hand-holding.

Supervision

Agents that need a babysitter.

If an engineer has to approve every step, the agent saves typing, not time.

Cost

Frontier-model bills that keep growing.

Long, multi-step jobs on frontier models get expensive, and the final bill is hard to predict.

Completeness

Half-finished output.

Snippets and drafts still need engineers to wire them into a product that actually runs.

How it works

From a written spec to a release candidate.

  1. Write the spec

    Describe the product or feature: what it does, who uses it and what it must connect to.

  2. Omega plans

    Agents turn the spec into an architecture and a task plan.

  3. Agents build

    Code and tests are written together, across services, in parallel.

  4. Tests run

    The build keeps going until the test and regression suites pass.

  5. Hand-off

    You get a tested release candidate, and it goes to red-teaming.

Spec to plan

Start from plain language.

Developers write what the product should do. Omega turns it into an architecture and a plan of tasks before any code is written, so the build has a clear shape from the start.

  • Plain-language specs
  • Architecture and task plan generated first
  • Requirements tracked through to tests
Acme CorpVendor portal / Planfrom spec v2
  • RequirementsSSO, document upload, two-step approval, audit trail…
    11
  • api/onboardingvendor accounts, SSO, approval flow
    ✓ planned
  • api/documentsuploads, checks, signed downloads
    ✓ planned
  • web/portalvendor and reviewer screens
    ✓ planned
  • Task graph4 parallel tracks
    27 tasks
Example plan
Build and test

Code and tests, built in parallel.

Agents work on independent parts of the product at the same time and write the tests alongside the code. Progress is visible task by task.

  • Parallel tracks across services
  • Tests written with the code
  • Live progress for every task
Acme CorpVendor portal / Build27 tasks · running
PLAN
✓Architecture3 services · Postgres · object storage
✓Task graph27 tasks · 4 parallel tracks
BUILD
✓api/onboarding14 files · 61 tests passing
✓api/documents9 files · 48 tests passing
●web/portal18 files · writing tests
○e2e suitequeued
HAND-OFF
○Regression suiteafter web/portal
○Red-teamingafter release candidate
Example runApprovals required: 0
No approvals

It fixes its own failures.

When a test fails, the agents find the cause, change the code and run the tests again. Nobody has to step in to keep the build moving.

  • Failures handled inside the run
  • Tests re-run after every fix
  • Your team reviews the finished result
Acme CorpVendor portal / Build / Activityapi/documents
  • ✓48/48 tests passed in api/documents
  • ●Re-running document upload tests
  • ✓Fixed: PDF/A files were rejected by the type check
  • ✕Test failed: upload accepts archival PDFs
Example activityHuman steps: 0
Who uses it

For teams that want products, not prompts.

Developers

Describe it once, review the result.

Write what needs to be built, then review a finished, tested release candidate instead of supervising every step.

Engineering leaders

More product, predictable cost.

Hand whole features to agents at a fixed price per seat, starting at $10 per seat per month, instead of open-ended token bills.

Works with the rest of Omega

One platform, three workflows.

Deployment and data

Where your work runs.

Omega cloud
A cluster dedicated to your organisation. No organisation shares a cluster with another.
On-prem
On request, Omega runs inside your own servers.
This workflow
Your code is planned, built and tested inside your dedicated cluster or your own servers.
Training
Your code, models and specifications are never used to train Omega's models.
FAQ

Questions about autonomous development.

Does anyone need to approve steps along the way?

No. Autonomous development runs from spec to tested release candidate with no human in the loop. Your team reviews the finished result.

What should a spec include?

What the product or feature should do, who will use it, and the systems it has to work with. The clearer the spec, the closer the first release candidate is to what you want.

What do we get at the end?

A tested release candidate: the code, its tests, and the results of the test and regression runs. It then goes to red-teaming before release.

How does the cost compare with frontier models?

Omega is designed to complete the same jobs for less than running them on frontier models. And because pricing is a fixed amount per seat, long jobs don't create surprise bills.

Where is the code built?

On your organisation's dedicated cluster on Omega cloud, or inside your own servers if you use Omega on-prem.

Get started

Send us a spec for one real feature.

We'll build it autonomously, test it, and red-team the result with you.

ContactRavi Shankarravishankar@svyasachi.com